J Gen Virol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 87 (2006), 3623-3630; DOI 10.1099/vir.0.82093-0

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.-S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.-S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.-S.
© 2006 Society for General Microbiology

MCP-1, a highly expressed chemokine in dengue haemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome patients, may cause permeability change, possibly through reduced tight junctions of vascular endothelium cells

Ying-Ray Lee1, Ming-Tao Liu2, Huan-Yao Lei1,3, Ching-Chuan Liu4, Jing-Ming Wu4, Yi-Ching Tung5, Yee-Shin Lin3, Trai-Ming Yeh3, Shun-Hua Chen3 and Hsiao-Sheng Liu3

1 Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 1 Da-Shue Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan
2 Tainan Hospital, Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Tainan, Taiwan
3 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 1 Da-Shue Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan
4 Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 1 Da-Shue Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan
5 Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Correspondence
Hsiao-Sheng Liu
a713{at}mail.ncku.edu.tw


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Vascular leakage, one hallmark of dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome, has been linked to the mediators secreted from cells in the circulatory system. In this study, extremely high expression levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) were found in the plasma of DHF patients compared with low MCP-1 expression levels in the plasma of enterovirus 71-infected patients. It was also found that MCP-1 expression was induced in dengue virus 2 (DV2)-infected monocytes and lymphocytes, but not in liver or endothelial cells. Exposing monolayers of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) to recombinant human MCP-1 (rhMCP-1) or to the culture supernatant of DV2-infected human monocytes increased the vascular permeability of the cells. MCP-1-neutralizing monoclonal antibody only partially prevented monolayer permeability change. Consistently, the distribution of the tight junction protein ZO-1 on the cellular membranes of HUVECs was disrupted by rhMCP-1 or by the conditioned medium of DV2-infected monocytes. In summary, it was found that the increased permeability and disrupted tight junctions of human vascular endothelium cells were effected through a mechanism partially dependent on MCP-1, which was secreted by DV2-infected monocytes and lymphocytes.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Dengue viruses (DVs), which belong to the genus Flavivirus, may cause symptomatic infection with clinical syndromes that include the mild, undifferentiated febrile illness called classical dengue fever (DF) and a more severe disease, the potentially fatal, four-level, plasma-leakage syndrome known as dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) (grades I and II) or dengue shock syndrome (DSS) (grades III and IV) (Halstead, 2002Down; Monath, 1994Down). The hallmarks of DHF and DSS are vascular leakage, thrombocytopenia and haemoconcentration (Bhamarapravati, 1989Down; Kalayanarooj et al., 1997Down; Nimmannitya, 1987Down; Rothman & Ennis, 1999Down).

As the endothelium forms the primary barrier of the circulatory system, dysfunction of the endothelial cells during acute diseases can broadly affect vascular permeability and cause plasma leakage. Although DV-infected human endothelial cells undergoing apoptosis have been reported (Avirutnan et al., 1998Down; Bunyaratvej et al., 1997Down; Diamond et al., 2000Down; Huang et al., 2000Down), no virus has been detected in the endothelial cells from biopsy skin samples (Andrews et al., 1978Down; Jessie et al., 2004Down; Killen & O'Sullivan, 1993Down; Sahaphong et al., 1980Down). One of the most severe symptoms of DV-related inflammation is vascular leakage, which has been linked to mediators secreted by cells in the circulatory system (Rothman & Ennis, 1999Down).

Monocytes and macrophages have been demonstrated to be the targets of DV infection in the circulatory system, both in vitro and in vivo (Halstead & O'Rourke, 1977Down; King et al., 1999Down; Kliks, 1990Down; Kurane et al., 1990Down; O'Sullivan & Killen, 1994Down; Rothman & Ennis, 1999Down). In culture, DV replicates in monocyte-derived macrophages and monocyte-like cell lines. DV infection of the cells is not cytolytic, but alters the secretion of cytokines from infected cells (Bosch et al., 2002Down; Carr et al., 2003Down; Chang & Shaio, 1994Down; Hober et al., 1996Down; Moreno-Altamirano et al., 2004Down; Shaio et al., 1995Down). Many permeability-related modulators in endothelial cells regulate the endothelium to function as an active barrier between blood and tissue. For example, increasing levels of circulating vasoactive factors, including tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-{alpha}, interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-8 and human cytotoxic factor (hCF) have been reported in DV-infected patients (Bosch et al., 2002Down; Chang & Shaio, 1994Down; Hober et al., 1996Down). hCF is produced by DV-infected T cells and induces leakage in the peritoneal cavity of mice (Khanna et al., 1990Down).

In this study, we propose the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) as a novel candidate modulating vascular permeability in DHF/DSS patients. MCP-1, a member of the CC chemokine family, is critical for directing the extravasation of mononuclear cells into inflamed, infected and traumatized sites (Leonard & Yoshimura, 1990Down).


   METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Cells and culture.
Human blood from healthy donors was collected and separated into peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and neutrophils using a density gradient kit (Nycoprep 1.077; Life Technologies). Monocytes in the PBMCs were then absorbed on to serum-coated culture flasks for 2 h. Adherent monocytic cells were detached from the flask and resuspended in RPMI 1640 containing 5 % autologous plasma (Gibco). Isolated cells were plated in six-well culture plates at a density of 2x106 cells per well. Cell viability was determined using trypan blue exclusion and the purity of monocytes was confirmed using flow cytometry with anti-human CD14 antibody. Only cell preparations with 95 % viability and 90 % purity or greater were used. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were collected from umbilical cord veins using a procedure described previously (Gamble et al., 1985Down). Briefly, cells isolated from an individual umbilical cord were grown in Medium 199 (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10 % fetal calf serum (FCS; Life Technologies), 2 mM L-glutamine (Life Technologies), 100 U penicillin ml–1 and 100 µg streptomycin (Life Technologies) ml–1at 37 °C in an incubator with humidified air and 5 % CO2. Only passage-two HUVECs were used.

Patient sera.
Dengue patient sera were kindly provided by Dr N. T. Hung (Department of Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever, Children's Hospital No. 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam). Forty-four serum samples were collected from patients with DF and DHF (grades I and II) or DSS (grades III and IV). The diagnosis of DHF was based on the clinical criteria established by the World Health Organization. Twenty-seven serum samples were collected from patients with enterovirus 71 (EV71) infection, kindly provided by Dr C.-C. Liu (Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan). Sera from healthy volunteers were used as negative controls.

DV infection of monocytes.
Healthy human monocytes in 10 cm culture plates were trypsinized and resuspended in RPMI 1640. Cells (2x106) were seeded into each well of a six-well culture plate. After overnight incubation, DV or heat-inactivated DV (56 °C, 30 min) was added to the monocytes at an m.o.i. of 1 and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h (Habot-Wilner et al., 2005Down). The culture medium was then removed and replaced with fresh growth medium (1.5 ml per well). The conditioned media were harvested at various time points post-infection (p.i.), processed through a 0.22 µm filter and stored in a freezer at –70 °C.

RT-PCR.
Expression levels of MCP-1 and beta-actin mRNA were determined using RT-PCR analysis. Total cellular RNA from 1x106 HUVECs, hepatoma Hep3B cells or monocytes was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration of RNA was determined using a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 260 nm (U-2000; Hitachi). cDNA was prepared using total RNA (1 µg) extracted from various cells and reverse transcription, as described previously (Lin et al., 2000Down), using a GeneAmp PCR System 9600 (Perkin-Elmer). The PCR was conducted in 50 µl reaction mixture (1.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.2 mM each of dATP, dGTP, dCTP and dTTP) containing primers at 1.5 µM each, 0.2 µg RNase A (Sigma-Aldrich) ml–1, 1 µl cDNA template and 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Promega). The PCR program was as follows: 94 °C for 1 min; 30 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 2 min; and a final cycle at 72 °C for 5 min. The oligonucleotide primers used for recombinant human MCP-1 (rhMCP-1) (sense, 5'-TCCCCGCGGATGAAAGTCTCTGCCGCCC-3'; antisense, 5'-CCGCTCCGAGTCAAGTCTTCGGAGTTTGGG-3') and beta-actin (sense, 5'-TGGAATCCTGTGGCATCCATGAAAC-3'; antisense, 5'-TAAAACGCAGCTCAGTAACAGTCCG-3') were according to previously published sequences (Li et al., 1993Down; Lin et al., 2000Down).

ELISA.
MCP-1 in the culture supernatants and sera (control, EV71-infected and DHF patients) was detected using ELISA kits (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration of MCP-1 was measured by spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 450 nm using an ELISA reader (Molecular Devices).

Assay of endothelial-cell permeability changes.
HUVECs were isolated from umbilical cords (12–24 h old) using 0.05 % collagenase digestion (Sigma-Aldrich). Passage-two endothelial cells were seeded on to membranes (Transwell Clear) with 0.4 mm pores (5x104 cells per well) and cultured in endothelial basal medium-2 (EBM-2; Cambrex Bio Science Walkersville) accompanied by endothelial growth medium-2 (EGM-2; Cambrex Bio Science Walkersville). The Transwell device consists of an upper chamber formed by the membrane contained within an insert that is placed inside the well of a 24-well plate and a normal lower chamber. On day 1 post-plating, the medium in the upper chamber was changed to Opti-MEM (Gibco) containing 2 % FCS (v/v). On day 2 post-plating, the assay was carried out as follows: the medium in the upper chamber of the Transwell was replaced with 150 µl fresh Opti-MEM (serum-free) plus 30 µl mock-infected or DV2-infected monocyte-culture supernatant. The cells were then incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. Next, 15 µl streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (R&D Systems) diluted 1 : 6 with serum-free Opti-MEM was added to the upper chamber of the Transwell and the medium was collected from the lower chamber (20 µl) at 15 min after adding streptavidin–HRP. Samples were assayed for HRP activity with o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (R&D Systems) as the substrate using a colorimetric assay and the concentrations were determined using an ELISA reader at a wavelength of 450 nm. Neutralizing-antibody suppression of permeability change was analysed by pre-incubating the tested media with the antibody at 4 °C for 30 min.

Immunofluorescence staining of ZO-1 protein.
To study the effect of MCP-1 on the distribution of the endothelial tight junction protein ZO-1, untreated HUVEC monolayers were seeded on to coverslips and treated with or without rhMCP-1 (R&D Systems) or DV2-infected monocyte-culture supernatant at 37 °C for 3 h. After three washes with PBS, all monolayers were fixed at room temperature in PBS containing 2 % paraformaldehyde for 10 min. After three washes with PBS, cells were permeabilized at room temperature for 5 min with 0.1 % Triton X-100 in PBS. Cells were also blocked with 2 % BSA in PBS at room temperature for 30 min and washed three times with PBS before being immunolabelled with mouse monoclonal antibody ZO-1 (BD Biosciences) to detect ZO-1 expression. After three washes with PBS, Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG monoclonal antibody (Invitrogen) was used as the secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 h (diluted 1 : 300 with PBS). Non-specific fluorescence was assessed using secondary antibody only and all samples were incubated with 0.02 µg 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole ml–1 in PBS for 5 min, followed by three washes with PBS. Samples were investigated under a laser confocal scanning microscope (TCS SP2; Leica).


   RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
MCP-1 is expressed at high levels in the sera of DHF patients
We collected sera from 44 DV-infected patients, 27 EV71-infected patients and 14 healthy controls to measure the expression levels of MCP-1. MCP-1 levels in the plasma of DF and DHF patients were increased significantly compared with those in EV71-infected patients and healthy controls (Fig. 1Down; Table 1Down). In addition, the expression level of MCP-1 in DHF patients (2065–2800 pg ml–1) was higher than that in DF patients (919–1837 pg ml–1). However, expression levels of MCP-1 in DHF grade I to grade IV patients were not significantly different (Fig. 1Down). Our results demonstrate that DV specifically upregulated MCP-1 expression in the sera of the three patient groups and that DHF patients (grades I–IV) showed the highest levels of MCP-1 expression.


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Evaluation of MCP-1 expression levels in the sera of DV- and EV71-infected patients. MCP-1 expression was measured in the sera of 14 healthy controls (normal), four patients with DF, 40 patients with DHF (grades I–IV) and 27 patients with EV71 infection by ELISA assay.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical and laboratory measurements of DV-infected and EV71-infected patients after diagnosis at admission, by disease

Data are means±SD unless otherwise indicated. HFMD, Hand, foot and mouth disease; AM, aseptic meningitis; BE, brainstem encephalitis; ANSD, autonomic nervous-system dysregulation; PE, pulmonary oedema; PH, pulmonary haemorrhage; NA, not applicable.

 
Transcriptional upregulation of MCP-1 in DV-infected monocytes
To determine which cell types can be induced to overexpress MCP-1, we determined the levels of MCP-1 mRNA expression in healthy human monocytes, Hep3B cells and HUVECs following infection with DV2. MCP-1 mRNA expression in DV2-infected, heat-inactivated DV2-infected and mock-infected cells (medium treatment only) were determined using RT-PCR. At the same time, we measured the percentage of DV2 infection of monocytes (95–100 %), Hep3B (95–100 %) and HUVECs (70–85 %) by immunofluorescence staining (data not shown). There was a dramatic increase in MCP-1 mRNA levels in DV2-infected monocytes compared with mock-infected and heat-inactivated DV2 groups (Fig. 2a, bDown). No MCP-1 expression was detected in Hep3B cells or HUVECs. In contrast, expression of another chemokine, RANTES, was elevated in DV2-infected HUVECs (detected using RT-PCR; data not shown). Our data indicated that active DV2 infection can induce mRNA expression of the highly monocyte-specific MCP-1.


Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Detection of MCP-1 mRNA expression in DV2-infected cells. Human monocytes, hepatoma cells (Hep3B) and HUVECs expressed MCP-1 mRNA 36 h after mock infection or infection with DV2 and heat-inactivated DV2 (iDV2) (m.o.i.=1), demonstrated by RT-PCR. beta-Actin was used as the internal control. Quantitation of the results is shown in (b). The experiment was conducted at least three times.

 
Detection of MCP-1 secretion by DV2-infected monocytes
Based on the above results, we next measured expression of the secreted form of MCP-1 protein in DV2-infected monocytes using ELISA. We initially determined the MCP-1 expression levels at different multiplicities of DV2 infection. MCP-1 expression was highest following DV2 infection at an m.o.i. of 1 and then remained at a plateau for higher multiplicities (Fig. 3aDown). The supernatants of monocytes infected with DV2 at an m.o.i. of 1 were collected at 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h p.i. and analysed by ELISA. Consistent with the results in Fig. 2Up, a significant increase in MCP-1 protein expression was detected in the supernatants of DV2-infected monocytes from 36 to 72 h p.i. (Fig. 3bDown). The highest expression level of MCP-1 in DV2-infected monocytes occurred at 36 h p.i. The decrease in MCP-1 expression at 48 h p.i. was caused by extensive cell death. We detected no significant differences in MCP-1 expression levels between monocytes that were mock-infected or infected with heat-inactivated DV2. Although we detected MCP-1 expression in both DV2-infected and stimulated healthy human B and T cells, these expression levels were lower than in monocytes (data not shown). Our data clearly demonstrated that DV2 infection induced monocytes to secrete MCP-1 and that MCP-1 expression reached its highest level at an m.o.i. of 1 at 36 h p.i.


Figure 3
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Detection of MCP-1 protein in the culture supernatant of DV2-infected monocytes. (a) Human monocytes were mock-infected or infected with DV2 or heat-inactivated DV2 (iDV2) at various m.o.i. The level of MCP-1 in the culture supernatant was measured by ELISA at 36 h p.i. (b) Human monocytes were mock-infected or infected with DV2 or heat-inactivated DV2 at an m.o.i. of 1 for the times indicated and levels of MCP-1 in the culture supernatant were measured by ELISA. The data represent the mean±SD from three independent experiments. bullet, Mock; {blacksquare}, DV2; {blacktriangleup}, iDV2.

 
DV2-infected monocyte-culture supernatant induces permeability alterations in the HUVEC monolayer
We assayed the permeability change in HUVECs using a Transwell system as described previously (Gamble et al., 1985Down). To determine the optimal exposure time of HUVEC monolayers to the supernatant of DV2-infected monocytes, we exposed HUVEC monolayers for various times to culture supernatant from monocytes that had been infected with DV2 for 36 h. The highest HRP activity, indicating a change in permeability, was detected in HUVEC monolayers exposed for 3 h (Fig. 4aDown). HUVECs were then exposed for 3 h to the supernatants from DV2-infected monocytes collected at various times p.i. The highest level of permeability was detected at 36 h p.i. in DV2-infected monocytes (Fig. 4bDown). Moreover, the permeability increase was dependent on the multiplicity of DV2 infection (Fig. 4cDown). Heat-inactivated DV2 affected the permeability of HUVECs only slightly, confirming that DV2 infection of monocytes caused the permeability change. Thus, our data indicate that factors in the culture supernatant of DV2-infected monocytes are responsible for the permeability change in HUVECs.


Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Detection of the effect of DV2-infected monocyte culture supernatant on the permeability of HUVECs. (a) HUVEC monolayers were grown in Transwells and then treated for the indicated times with the culture supernatants of monocytes infected with DV2 or mock-infected for 36 h. Changes in permeability of the endothelial-cell monolayer were assessed by measuring HRP activity (see Methods). (b) HUVEC monolayers were exposed to the culture supernatant of DV2-infected monocytes (m.o.i.=1) for 3 h. The culture supernatants used were collected from the media of infected monocytes at various time points p.i. as indicated. (c) The endothelial-cell monolayer was treated for 3 h with the culture supernatants collected from monocytes infected with DV2 at various m.o.i. for 36 h. Data are displayed as the mean±SD from three independent experiments. Empty bars, mock; filled bars, DV2; shaded bars, iDV2.

 
Both rhMCP-1 and conditioned medium from DV2-infected monocytes increases the permeability of HUVECs
Rat endothelial MCP-1 induced by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been shown to cause vascular leakage in vivo (Yamada et al., 2003Down), indicating the involvement of MCP-1 in permeability. Consistent with this, we found a correlation between the degree of permeability change in a HUVEC monolayer after co-culturing with DV2-infected monocyte-culture medium and the kinetics of MCP-1 expression in DV2-infected monocyte-culture medium (Figs 3b and 4bUpUp). Therefore, we wanted to clarify whether the permeability change in HUVECs was caused by MCP-1 in the culture medium of DV2-infected monocytes. The increased permeability of HUVECs correlated in a dose-dependent manner with treatment with rhMCP-1 (Fig. 5aDown). This effect could be reversed by pre-incubating rhMCP-1 with MCP-1-neutralizing antibody, but not with control IgG1 antibody (Fig. 5aDown). We also found that conditioned medium pre-treated with MCP-1-neutralizing antibody, but not control IgG1 antibody, reduced the permeability of HUVECs, which further confirmed that MCP-1 in the conditioned medium of DV2-infected monocytes was responsible for the permeability change. In this experiment, two concentrations of MCP-1 antibody were used; however, only a maximum of 70 % reversion of permeability change was reached, suggesting that the permeability alternation is only partially regulated by MCP-1 in DV2-infected monocyte-culture media (Fig. 5bDown). Our data demonstrated that MCP-1 exists in the DV2-infected monocyte-culture medium and is partially responsible for the permeability change of HUVECs.


Figure 5
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Determination of factors in the culture medium of DV2-infected monocytes that cause permeability changes in HUVECs. (a) HUVEC monolayers were exposed to various amounts of rhMCP-1. MCP-1-neutralizing antibody was used to block the effect of MCP-1. IgG1 was used as a negative control. Culture supernatants were collected after 3 h and HRP activity was measured. (b) DV2-infected monocyte-culture supernatants were pre-incubated with MCP-1-neutralizing antibody, control IgG1 or anti-VEGF antibody for 30 min. HRP activity was measured after 3 h co-culture with HUVECs. The conditioned medium was collected at 36 h after DV2 infection (m.o.i.=1) of monocytes. Data are displayed as the mean±SD from three independent experiments.

 
MCP-1 in the culture medium of DV2-infected monocytes causes reorganization of the HUVEC tight junction protein ZO-1
Disarray of tight junction proteins and actins has been shown to cause endothelial permeability change (Lum & Malik, 1996Down) and MCP-1-induced tight junction openings in brain endothelial cells via a small GTPase Rho and a Rho kinase (Stamatovic et al., 2003Down). Therefore, we explored whether MCP-1 from DV2-infected monocyte-culture medium could perturb the tight junction by observing the distribution of the endothelial-cell tight junction protein ZO-1. Immunofluorescence staining showed that there was no perturbation of the HUVEC tight junction following mock treatment (Fig. 6aDown), but that perturbation was apparent in HUVECs treated with rhMCP-1 (Fig. 6bDown), DV2-infected monocyte conditioned medium (Fig. 6dDown) and DV2-infected culture medium combined with control IgG1 antibody (Fig. 6fDown). In contrast, pre-treatment of DV2-infected monocyte conditioned medium with MCP-1-neutralizing antibody reversed the change in ZO-1 distribution (Fig. 6eDown). Direct DV2 infection of HUVECs for 3 h did not affect ZO-1 distribution (Fig. 6cDown). Taken together, our results show that MCP-1 in the DV2-infected monocyte-culture supernatant perturbs the distribution of the tight junction protein ZO-1 in HUVECs.


Figure 6
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Immunofluorescent analysis of perturbation of the tight junction protein ZO-1 on the outer membrane of HUVECs cultured with DV2-infected monocyte-culture supernatant. HUVECs were treated for 3 h with culture medium only (a), rhMCP-1 (b), DV2 (m.o.i.=1) (c) or DV2-infected monocyte-culture medium (d), or with DV2-infected monocyte-culture medium pre-treated with MCP-1-neutralizing antibody (e) or with control IgG1 (f) for 30 min. The tight junction protein ZO-1 was labelled using anti-ZO-1 antibody and observed under a laser confocal scanning microscope. Arrows indicate ZO-1 distribution.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
In contrast to several in vitro studies reporting that DV replicates in endothelial cells (Andrews et al., 1978Down; Bosch et al., 2002Down; Chen et al., 1996Down; Talavera et al., 2004Down) and causes structural alteration, damage and apoptosis of endothelial cells (Avirutnan et al., 1998Down; Sahaphong et al., 1980Down), we found no evidence of DV replicating in or causing damage to the endothelium in patients, although viral antigens have been detected in biopsies of lung, liver and brain vascular endothelium of patients (Bhoopat et al., 1996Down; Hall et al., 1991Down; Jessie et al., 2004Down). This suggests that the detection of viral antigens in the endothelium of these tissues may due to the pinocytosis. One current hypothesis for the cause of DHF/DSS is that DV infection induces the secretion of cytokines and chemokines, causing endothelial cells to dysfunction (Rothman & Ennis, 1999Down).

Avirutnan et al. (1998)Down first reported MCP-1 overexpression in the sera of DSS patients. However, the role of MCP-1 in the pathogenesis of DV infection has not been determined. We found that MCP-1 overexpression occurred at a significantly higher level in DV-infected patients than in EV71-infected patients (Fig. 1Up and Table 1Up). Furthermore, MCP-1 expression levels were much higher in DHF/DSS patients than in DF patients, EV71-infected patients or normal controls.

DV infection inducing MCP-1 overexpression was also cell-type specific and one of the major cell types of MCP-1 production was monocytes (Fig. 2Up). As antibody-dependent enhancement increases the infection levels of monocytes infected with different DV serotypes (Halstead & O'Rourke, 1977Down), we conjecture that it might subsequently increase MCP-1 expression. In addition, Lin et al. (2005)Down demonstrated that anti-DV-NS1 antibody bound to vascular endothelial cells and induced MCP-1 overexpression, which upregulated ICAM-1 expression and increased the adherence of PBMCs to the anti-DV-NS1 antibody-bound endothelial cells. Whether MCP-1 released from DV-infected monocytes also upregulates the adherence of molecules expressed on endothelial cells requires further exploration.

MCP-1 causes endothelial-cell tight junction openings in vitro (Stamatovic et al., 2003Down) and VEGF-induced MCP-1 expression in vascular endothelial cells elevates endothelial permeability changes in vivo (Yamada et al., 2003Down). We found that both rhMCP-1 and MCP-1-containing conditioned medium of DV-infected monocytes increased vascular endothelial-cell permeability (Fig. 5a, bUp). We also clarified that MCP-1, but not VEGF, in the culture medium of DV-infected monocytes increased endothelial permeability. VEGF expression in DV-infected monocyte-culture medium was very low compared with MCP-1 (data not shown). As DV-infected HUVECs did not express MCP-1 (Fig. 2Up), the permeability change in the endothelial cells in this study system was caused by the MCP-1 from DV-infected monocytes.

We found that MCP-1-neutralizing antibody reversed a maximum of 70 % of the permeability change (Fig. 5bUp). This suggests that the permeability change is affected partially by MCP-1 from DV2-infected monocyte-culture medium; therefore, one or more other mediators are also involved. Several studies (Chen & Wang, 2002Down; Moreno-Altamirano et al., 2004Down) have reported that DV infection induces the overexpression of many chemokines and cytokines in monocytes, such as TNF-{alpha}, IFN-{alpha}, IL-1beta, IL-8, IL-12, MIP-1{alpha}, MCP-1 and RANTES. These studies provide additional evidence that multiple factors affect the permeability change in endothelial cells.

We found that the distribution of the endothelial-cell tight junction protein ZO-1 on the cell membrane was disrupted, at least in part, after it had been exposed to DV-infected monocyte-culture medium containing MCP-1. As DV infection increased MCP-1 expression in monocytes, we speculate that MCP-1 may increase endothelial-cell permeability changes through the perturbation of endothelial-cell tight junction protein ZO-1 distribution.

MCP-1 overexpression has been detected in many chronic diseases, such as atherosclerosis, type II diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Mezzano et al., 2004Down; Scholz et al., 2001Down; Yu et al., 2004Down). In contrast, MCP-1 overexpression induced by DV infection is transient and systematic compared with the prolonged and localized MCP-1 expression in these chronic diseases. Therefore, MCP-1 overexpression in various diseases may play different roles and cause various clinical symptoms. For this reason, we hypothesize that patients infected with DV combined with another disease that induces MCP-1 expression are at greater risk of progressing to DHF/DSS than DV patients without such a complication.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This work was supported by grant NHRI-CN-CL9303P from the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan. We acknowledge the editorial assistance of Bill Franke.


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Andrews, B. S., Theofilopoulos, A. N., Peters, C. J., Loskutoff, D. J., Brandt, W. E. & Dixon, F. J. (1978). Replication of dengue and junin viruses in cultured rabbit and human endothelial cells. Infect Immun 20, 776–781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Avirutnan, P., Malasit, P., Seliger, B., Bhakdi, S. & Husmann, M. (1998). Dengue virus infection of human endothelial cells leads to chemokine production, complement activation, and apoptosis. J Immunol 161, 6338–6346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bhamarapravati, N. (1989). Hemostatic defects in dengue hemorrhagic fever. Rev Infect Dis 11 (Suppl. 4), S826–S829.

Bhoopat, L., Bhamarapravati, N., Attasiri, C., Yoksarn, S., Chaiwun, B., Khunamornpong, S. & Sirisanthana, V. (1996). Immunohistochemical characterization of a new monoclonal antibody reactive with dengue virus-infected cells in frozen tissue using immunoperoxidase technique. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 14, 107–113.[Medline]

Bosch, I., Xhaja, K., Estevez, L., Raines, G., Melichar, H., Warke, R. V., Fournier, M. V., Ennis, F. A. & Rothman, A. L. (2002). Increased production of interleukin-8 in primary human monocytes and in human epithelial and endothelial cell lines after dengue virus challenge. J Virol 76, 5588–5597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bunyaratvej, A., Butthep, P., Yoksan, S. & Bhamarapravati, N. (1997). Dengue viruses induce cell proliferation and morphological changes of endothelial cells. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 28 (Suppl. 3), 32–37.[Medline]

Carr, J. M., Hocking, H., Bunting, K., Wright, P. J., Davidson, A., Gamble, J., Burrell, C. J. & Li, P. (2003). Supernatants from dengue virus type-2 infected macrophages induce permeability changes in endothelial cell monolayers. J Med Virol 69, 521–528.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chang, D.-M. & Shaio, M.-F. (1994). Production of interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-1 inhibitor by human monocytes exposed to dengue virus. J Infect Dis 170, 811–817.[Medline]

Chen, Y.-C. & Wang, S.-Y. (2002). Activation of terminally differentiated human monocytes/macrophages by dengue virus: productive infection, hierarchical production of innate cytokines and chemokines, and the synergistic effect of lipopolysaccharide. J Virol 76, 9877–9887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chen, Y., Maguire, T. & Marks, R. M. (1996). Demonstration of binding of dengue virus envelope protein to target cells. J Virol 70, 8765–8772.[Abstract]

Diamond, M. S., Edgil, D., Roberts, T. G., Lu, B. & Harris, E. (2000). Infection of human cells by dengue virus is modulated by different cell types and viral strains. J Virol 74, 7814–7823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gamble, J. R., Harlan, J. M., Klebanoff, S. J. & Vadas, M. A. (1985). Stimulation of the adherence of neutrophils to umbilical vein endothelium by human recombinant tumor necrosis factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82, 8667–8671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Habot-Wilner, Z., Moisseiev, J., Bin, H. & Rubinovitch, B. (2005). A returned traveler with dengue fever and visual impairment. Isr Med Assoc J 7, 200–201.[Medline]

Hall, W. C., Crowell, T. P., Watts, D. M., Barros, V. L., Kruger, H., Pinheiro, F. & Peters, C. J. (1991). Demonstration of yellow fever and dengue antigens in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human liver by immunohistochemical analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 45, 408–417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Halstead, S. B. (2002). Dengue. Curr Opin Infect Dis 15, 471–476.[Medline]

Halstead, S. B. & O'Rourke, E. J. (1977). Dengue viruses and mononuclear phagocytes. I. Infection enhancement by non-neutralizing antibody. J Exp Med 146, 201–217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hober, D., Delannoy, A. S., Benyoucef, S., De Groote, D. & Wattre, P. (1996). High levels of sTNFR p75 and TNF{alpha} in dengue-infected patients. Microbiol Immunol 40, 569–573.[Medline]

Huang, Y.-H., Lei, H.-Y., Liu, H.-S., Lin, Y.-S., Liu, C.-C. & Yeh, T.-M. (2000). Dengue virus infects human endothelial cells and induces IL-6 and IL-8 production. Am J Trop Med Hyg 63, 71–75.[Abstract]

Jessie, K., Fong, M. Y., Devi, S., Lam, S. K. & Wong, K. T. (2004). Localization of dengue virus in naturally infected human tissues, by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. J Infect Dis 189, 1411–1418.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kalayanarooj, S., Vaughn, D. W., Nimmannitya, S. & 10 other authors (1997). Early clinical and laboratory indicators of acute dengue illness. J Infect Dis 176, 313–321.[Medline]

Khanna, M., Chaturvedi, U. C., Sharma, M. C., Pandey, V. C. & Mathur, A. (1990). Increased capillary permeability mediated by a dengue virus-induced lymphokine. Immunology 69, 449–453.[Medline]

Killen, H. & O'Sullivan, M. A. (1993). Detection of dengue virus by in situ hybridization. J Virol Methods 41, 135–146.[CrossRef][Medline]

King, A. D., Nisalak, A., Kalayanrooj, S., Myint, K. S., Pattanapanyasat, K., Nimmannitya, S. & Innis, B. L. (1999). B cells are the principal circulating mononuclear cells infected by dengue virus. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 30, 718–728.[Medline]

Kliks, S. (1990). Antibody-enhanced infection of monocytes as the pathogenetic mechanism for severe dengue illness. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 6, 993–998.[Medline]

Kurane, I., Kontny, U., Janus, J. & Ennis, F. A. (1990). Dengue-2 virus infection of human mononuclear cell lines and establishment of persistent infections. Arch Virol 110, 91–101.[CrossRef][Medline]

Leonard, E. J. & Yoshimura, T. (1990). Human monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). Immunol Today 11, 97–101.[CrossRef][Medline]

Li, Y.-S., Shyy, Y.-J., Wright, J. G., Valente, A. J., Cornhill, J. F. & Kolattukudy, P. E. (1993). The expression of monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP-1) in human vascular endothelium in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cell Biochem 126, 61–68.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lin, Y.-L., Liu, C.-C., Chuang, J.-I., Lei, H.-Y., Yeh, T.-M., Lin, Y.-S., Huang, Y.-H. & Liu, H.-S. (2000). Involvement of oxidative stress, NF-IL-6, and RANTES expression in dengue-2-virus-infected human liver cells. Virology 276, 114–126.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lin, C.-F., Chiu, S.-C., Hsiao, Y.-L. & 8 other authors (2005). Expression of cytokine, chemokine, and adhesion molecules during endothelial cell activation induced by antibodies against dengue virus nonstructural protein 1. J Immunol 174, 395–403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lum, H. & Malik, A. B. (1996). Mechanisms of increased endothelial permeability. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 74, 787–800.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mezzano, S., Aros, C., Droguett, A., Burgos, M. E., Ardiles, L., Flores, C., Schneider, H., Ruiz-Ortega, M. & Egido, J. (2004). NF-{kappa}B activation and overexpression of regulated genes in human diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19, 2505–2512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Monath, T. P. (1994). Dengue: the risk to developed and developing countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 2395–2400.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moreno-Altamirano, M. M. B., Romano, M., Legorreta-Herrera, M., Sánchez-García, F. J. & Colston, M. J. (2004). Gene expression in human macrophages infected with dengue virus serotype-2. Scand J Immunol 60, 631–638.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nimmannitya, S. (1987). Clinical spectrum and management of dengue haemorrhagic fever. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 18, 392–397.[Medline]

O'Sullivan, M. A. & Killen, H. M. (1994). The differentiation state of monocytic cells affects their susceptibility to infection and the effects of infection by dengue virus. J Gen Virol 75, 2387–2392.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rothman, A. L. & Ennis, F. A. (1999). Immunopathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Virology 257, 1–6.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sahaphong, S., Riengrojpitak, S., Bhamarapravati, N. & Chirachariyavej, T. (1980). Electron microscopic study of the vascular endothelial cell in dengue hemorrhagic fever. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 11, 194–204.[Medline]

Scholz, D., Cai, W.-J. & Schaper, W. (2001). Arteriogenesis, a new concept of vascular adaptation in occlusive disease. Angiogenesis 4, 247–257.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shaio, M.-F., Cheng, S.-N., Yuh, Y.-S. & Yang, K. D. (1995). Cytotoxic factors released by dengue virus-infected human blood monocytes. J Med Virol 46, 216–223.[Medline]

Stamatovic, S. M., Keep, R. F., Kunkel, S. L. & Andjelkovic, A. V. (2003). Potential role of MCP-1 in endothelial cell tight junction ‘opening’: signaling via Rho and Rho kinase. J Cell Sci 116, 4615–4628.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Talavera, D., Castillo, A. M., Dominguez, M. C., Gutierrez, A. E. & Meza, I. (2004). IL8 release, tight junction and cytoskeleton dynamic reorganization conducive to permeability increase are induced by dengue virus infection of microvascular endothelial monolayers. J Gen Virol 85, 1801–1813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamada, M., Kim, S., Egashira, K., Takeya, M., Ikeda, T., Mimura, O. & Iwao, H. (2003). Molecular mechanism and role of endothelial monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 induction by vascular endothelial growth factor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23, 1996–2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yu, Y., Ohmori, K., Chen, Y., Sato, C., Kiyomoto, H., Shinomiya, K., Takeuchi, H., Mizushige, K. & Kohno, M. (2004). Effects of pravastatin on progression of glucose intolerance and cardiovascular remodeling in a type II diabetes model. J Am Coll Cardiol 44, 904–913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received 3 April 2006; accepted 7 August 2006.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. Dejnirattisai, T. Duangchinda, C.-L. S. Lin, S. Vasanawathana, M. Jones, M. Jacobs, P. Malasit, X.-n. Xu, G. Screaton, and J. Mongkolsapaya
A Complex Interplay among Virus, Dendritic Cells, T Cells, and Cytokines in Dengue Virus Infections
J. Immunol., November 1, 2008; 181(9): 5865 - 5874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
J. H. Chidlow Jr., D. Shukla, M. B. Grisham, and C. G. Kevil
Pathogenic angiogenesis in IBD and experimental colitis: new ideas and therapeutic avenues
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): G5 - G18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.-S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.-S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.-S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS