J Gen Virol Try Microbiology Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 87 (2006), 3201-3208; DOI 10.1099/vir.0.82266-0

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ikegaya, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yogo, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ikegaya, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yogo, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ikegaya, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yogo, Y.
© 2006 Society for General Microbiology

Identification of a genomic subgroup of BK polyomavirus spread in European populations

Hiroshi Ikegaya1, Pekka J. Saukko2, Risto Tertti3, Kaj P. Metsärinne3, Michael J. Carr4,5, Brendan Crowley5,6, Koichi Sakurada1, Huai-Ying Zheng7, Tadaichi Kitamura7 and Yoshiaki Yogo7

1 National Research Institute of Police Science, 6-3-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882, Japan
2 Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Turku, Turku 20520, Finland
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku 20520, Finland
4 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, University of Dublin, Trinity College, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
5 National Virus Reference Laboratory, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
6 Department of Microbiology, Central Pathology Laboratory, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
7 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

Correspondence
Hiroshi Ikegaya
ikegaya-tky{at}umin.ac.jp


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
BK polyomavirus (BKV) is highly prevalent in the human population, infecting children without obvious symptoms and persisting in the kidney in a latent state. In immunosuppressed patients, BKV is reactivated and excreted in urine. BKV isolates worldwide are classified into four serologically distinct subtypes, I–IV, with subtype I being the most frequently detected. Furthermore, subtype I is subdivided into subgroups based on genomic variations. In this study, the distribution patterns of the subtypes and subgroups of BKV were compared among four patient populations with various immunosuppressive states and of various ethnic backgrounds: (A) Finnish renal-transplant recipients; (B) Irish/English haematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients with and without haemorrhagic cystitis; (C) Japanese renal-transplant recipients; and (D) Japanese bone-marrow transplant recipients. The typing sequences (287 bp) of BKV in population A were determined in this study; those in populations B–D have been reported previously. These sequences were subjected to phylogenetic and single nucleotide polymorphism analyses. Based on the results of these analyses, the BKV isolates in the four patient populations were classified into subtypes and subgroups. The incidence of subtype IV varied significantly among patient populations. Furthermore, the incidence of subgroup Ib-2 within subtype I was high in populations A and B, whereas that of Ic was high in populations C and D (P<0.01). These results suggest that subgroup Ib-2 is widespread among Europeans, whereas Ic is unique to north-east Asians. Furthermore, a phylogenetic analysis based on complete BKV DNA sequences supported the hypothesis that there is geographical separation of European and Asian BKV strains.

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the sequences reported in this paper are AB254341–AB254367, AB260028–AB260034 and DQ457405–DQ457412.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
BK polyomavirus (BKV) is highly prevalent in human populations (Knowles, 2001Down). After asymptomatic infection during early childhood, BKV persists in renal tissue (Heritage et al., 1981Down; Chesters et al., 1983Down). Upon immunosuppression, renal BKV becomes reactivated and replicates efficiently, followed by the excretion of progeny viruses (Knowles, 2001Down). In immunocompromised patients, the reactivation of BKV sometimes results in renal dysfunction, such as BKV-associated nephropathy (Moens & Rekvig, 2001Down).

BKV is the only primate polyomavirus that has subtypes (I–IV) that are distinguished on the basis of differences in serological reactivity (Knowles, 2001Down). Jin et al. (1993aDown or bDown) proposed a genotyping method with which to classify BKV isolates. Thus, they identified a region of the VP1 gene probably responsible for serotypic differences. This region was PCR-amplified and the amplified fragments were sequenced. The determined sequences were compared to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to distinct subtypes. This method, and versions involving restriction (Jin, 1993Down) or phylogenetic (Takasaka et al., 2004Down; Carr et al., 2006Down) analysis, have since been used to classify the BKV isolates obtained from several countries, including England, Ireland, Tanzania, USA and Japan (Jin, 1993Down; Jin et al., 1993bDown, 1995Down; Agostini et al., 1995Down; Di Taranto et al., 1997Down; Baksh et al., 2001Down; Takasaka et al., 2004Down; Carr et al., 2006Down). The results of these studies have indicated that: (i) subtype I predominates in all geographical regions; (ii) subtype IV occurs at lower rates; and (iii) subtypes II and III occur rarely. Therefore, it appears that there is no correlation between BKV subtype and geographical region. This is in striking contrast to the established correlation between subtypes of JC polyomavirus (JCV), the related human polyomavirus, and geographical region (Sugimoto et al., 1997Down; Agostini et al., 2001Down; Yogo et al., 2004Down).

Takasaka et al. (2004)Down found that BKV isolates classified as subtype I might be subclassified into at least three subgroups (Ia, Ib and Ic) based on phylogenetic analysis, and reported that most subtype I isolates in Japanese renal-transplant (RT) and bone-marrow transplant (BMT) patients belonged to subgroup Ic according to this classification. As their finding potentially suggested that a correlation might exist between the subtype I subgroups and human populations, we attempted in this study to subclassify the subtype I isolates in four patient populations with various immunosuppressive states and from various ethnic backgrounds: (A) Finnish RT recipients, (B) Irish/English haematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with and without haemorrhagic cystitis (HC), (C) Japanese RT recipients and (D) Japanese BMT recipients. The typing sequences (287 bp) of BKV in population A were determined in this study; those in populations B–D have been reported previously (Takasaka et al., 2004Down; Carr et al., 2006Down). These sequences were subjected to phylogenetic and SNP analyses to classify the BKV isolates in each of the four patient populations. The distribution patterns of the subtypes and subtype I subgroups were compared among the four patient populations in order to examine whether the incidence of subtypes or subgroups differs among patient populations.


   METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Patient populations.
Four patient populations with various clinical states and from various ethnic backgrounds were studied: (A) 27 Finnish RT recipients, (B) 35 Irish/English HSCT recipients with and without HC, (C) 29 Japanese RT recipients and (D) 31 Japanese BMT recipients. Population A is described in this study and the other populations have been described previously (B, Carr et al., 2006Down; C and D, Takasaka et al., 2004Down).

Amplification and sequencing of the typing region of BKV.
Urine samples were collected from 101 RT patients at Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland, with informed consent. The DNA was extracted as described previously (Kitamura et al., 1990Down). The 287 bp typing region of BKV was amplified from the DNA samples as described previously (Takasaka et al., 2004Down). The 287 bp region contained the whole effective sequence within the previously used 327 bp typing region (Jin et al., 1993aDown or bDown). Amplified fragments were detected by agarose-gel electrophoresis, purified by using Gel Filtration cartridges (Edge Biosystems) and subjected to a cycle-sequencing reaction using a BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit v. 3.1 (Applied Biosystems). DNA sequencing was performed by using an automated sequencer (3100 Avant DNA sequencer; Applied Biosystems).

Amplification and sequencing of the entire genome of BKV.
The entire BKV genome was amplified by using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Finnzymes Oy) and primers BKFu-IF and BKFu-IR. BKFu-IF was 5'-GGGGGATCCAGATGAAAACCTTAGGGGCT-3', nt 1731–1759 in the BKV (DUN) genome (Seif et al., 1979Down), and BKFu-IR was 5'-GGATCCCCCATTTCTGGGTTTAGGAAGCAT-3', nt 1739–1710. The total reaction volume of 50 µl contained 2.5 µl urinary DNA, 1 U Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase, 200 µM each dNTP, 0.5 µM primers and Phusion HF buffer supplied by the manufacturer. After initial denaturation at 98 °C for 2 min, amplification was performed for 40 cycles. The cycle profile was 98 °C for 20 s, 55 °C for 20 s and 72 °C for 4 min, with the final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. After amplification, the reaction mixtures were purified by using Montage PCR centrifugal filter devices and subjected to a cycle-sequencing reaction using a BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit v. 3.1 (Applied Biosystems). Primers used were a set of primers reported elsewhere (Nishimoto et al., 2006Down), excluding S-11 and S-12, and two additional primers: S-11n [5'-CTGAGGCCTAGCAAAACTAT-3', corresponding to nt 38–57 in the BKV (DUN) genome (Seif et al., 1979Down) with a few mismatches] and S12n (5'-TGAAGAAACTCTGCAATGGTG-3', corresponding to nt 4681–4701). Sequencing was carried out with an automated DNA sequencer (3130 Genetic Analyzer; Applied Biosystems).

Phylogenetic analysis.
The typing-region sequences of BKV determined in this study and those reported previously (Takasaka et al., 2004Down; Carr et al., 2006Down) were aligned by using the CLUSTAL_X program, v. 1.82 (Jeanmougin et al., 1998Down). The complete BKV DNA sequences determined in this and previous studies (Seif et al., 1979Down; Tavis et al., 1989Down; Chen et al., 2006Down; Nishimoto et al., 2006Down), together with that of SA-12 (a baboon polyomavirus related closely to BKV) (Cantalupo et al., 2005Down), were aligned similarly. From the aligned sequences, a neighbour-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree (Saitou & Nei, 1987Down) was constructed by using CLUSTAL_X with Kimura's correction (Kimura, 1980Down). The phylogenetic tree was visualized by using the NJplot program (Perrière & Gouy, 1996Down). To assess the confidence level of the phylogenetic tree, bootstrap probabilities (BPs) were estimated with 1000 bootstrap replicates (Felsenstein, 1985Down). BPs of >70 % were considered significant (Hillis & Bull, 1993Down).

Statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed by using a {chi}2 test with Yates correction and Fisher's exact test by using Microsoft Excel software. The significance level was set at 5 %.


   RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Phylogenetic analysis of BKV isolates
We constructed an NJ phylogenetic tree from 287 bp typing sequences of BKV in four patient populations, A–D (Table 1Down), plus 12 reference sequences (Table 2Down). The typing sequences in population A were detected and determined in this study, whereas those in populations B, C and D have been reported previously (Takasaka et al., 2004Down; Carr et al., 2006Down). According to the resultant phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1Down), the BKV isolates in various patient populations were classified into four major clusters, previously designated subtypes I–IV (Jin et al., 1993aDown or bDown; Takasaka et al., 2004Down; Carr et al., 2006Down), with BPs ranging from 95 % (subtype III) to 100 % (subtypes I, II and IV). Therefore, we could classify the BKV isolates in various patient populations unequivocally into subtypes I–IV (Table 1Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. BKV isolates analysed in this study

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. BKV isolates used as references in the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1Up)

 

Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree used to classify the BKV isolates detected into subtypes and subgroups. The 287 bp typing sequences detected in the four patient populations (see Table 1Up) plus 12 reference sequences (Table 2Up) were used to construct an NJ phylogenetic tree, using CLUSTAL_X with Kimura's correction. The phylogenetic tree was visualized by using the NJplot program. Subtypes and subtype I subgroups are indicated to the right of the tree. Numbers at nodes are BPs (%) obtained for 1000 replicates.

 
In addition, we observed that subtype I subdivided into subclusters with higher (72–75 %) or lower (48 %) BP (Fig. 1Up). As subtype I was previously subdivided into three subgroups, Ia, Ib and Ic (Takasaka et al., 2004Down), we attempted to assign these subgroups to the subclusters in Fig. 1Up. First, Ia was readily found to correspond to a subcluster that contained three isolates (Gardner, MM and DUN) classified previously as belonging to Ia. Four isolates in population B were included in subgroup Ia, but no isolates in the other populations were found in this subgroup. Second, Ic was found to correspond to a subcluster containing many Japanese isolates (population C and D isolates) classified previously as belonging to Ic. In this study, however, three isolates (KOM-20, -24 and RYU-2) previously left unclassified (Takasaka et al., 2004Down) were included in subgroup Ic based on the result of SNP analysis (see below), although one isolate (TW-8) in population C remained unclassified. Third, Ib was previously detected as a subcluster containing four reference isolates (GS, Dik, WW and JL) and five isolates in populations C and D (Takasaka et al., 2004Down), but in Fig. 1Up, these isolates were divided into two subclusters, one (herein designated Ib-1) containing most of the Ib isolates noted above, excluding JL, and the other (Ib-2) containing JL. Ib-1 included four isolates in population A and five in population B, whilst Ib-2 included 15 isolates in population A and 22 isolates in population B.

Subclassification of subtype I isolates based on SNPs
In Fig. 1Up, the BPs for most subgroups within subtype I were not very high (see above) and the subgroup classification therefore required support from other approaches. We examined whether any SNPs could be found among the subtype I subgroups. Alignment of all typing sequences belonging to subtype I and used for the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1Up) generated seven SNPs at nt 1687, 1698, 1809, 1860, 1887, 1908 and 1923 (Table 3Down). All or most isolates classified as Ia, Ib-1, Ib-2 or Ic based on the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1Up) had the same set of nucleotides assigned to Ia, Ib-1, Ib-2 and Ic, respectively, with two minor exceptions (Table 3Down). One exception was the Ib-2 isolates (FIN- 9 to -18, SJH-19 and -36, MAN-1 and -7 to -9) that contained C rather than A at nt 160 [interestingly, these isolates clustered together in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1Up)]. The other exception was three Ic isolates (RYU-2, KOM-20, 24) that had A rather than C at nt 238 (Table 3Down). In addition, one subtype I isolate (TW-8) not subclassified by the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1Up) could not be subclassified, due to the presence of multiple mismatches in the SNP comparison to each of the subtype I subgroups (Table 3Down). Nevertheless, TW-8 was classified unambiguously as belonging to Ic according to a phylogenetic analysis based on complete sequences (see below). Taken as a whole, the SNP analysis confirmed the subclassification of the subtype I isolates based on the phylogenetic analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. SNPs detected among subtype I subgroups

 
Distribution of subtypes and subgroups of BKV
The distribution of subtypes and subgroups of BKV in the four patient populations are shown in Table 4Down, and the findings are summarized in the following paragraphs.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. BKV subtypes and subgroups in various patient populations

 
In all patient populations, we confirmed the common pattern for the distribution of BKV subtypes: subtype I predominates, subtype IV occurs at lower rates and subtypes II and III occur rarely (see Introduction). Nevertheless, we found that the incidence of subtype IV varied markedly among patient populations, being higher (13–30 %) in populations A, C and D and lower (3 %) in population B. In reference to the incidence of subtype I, the incidence of subtype IV was significantly different between populations A and B (P<0.01) and between populations B and C (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the other pairwise comparisons. With these results, it was not possible to determine whether the difference in the incidence of subtype IV is related to ethnic background or to clinical state.

The incidence of subgroups Ib-2 and Ic varied markedly among patient populations. In populations A and B, Ib-2 occurred at high rates (56 and 61 %, respectively), but Ic did not occur at all. In contrast, in populations C and D, Ib-2 did not occur at all, but instead Ic occurred at high rates (69 and 71 %, respectively). The differences observed between A and C, between A and D, between B and C and between B and D were all statistically significant (P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference between A and B or between C and D. These results suggest that the high incidence of Ib-2 or Ic is linked to the ethnic origin (i.e. European or Japanese) of the sample donors rather than to their clinical state.

Phylogenetic analysis of subtype I isolates based on complete viral DNA sequences
Nishimoto et al. (2006)Down recently reported 28 complete BKV DNA sequences mainly derived from the urine of Japanese RT and BMT patients (Table 5Down). Here, we amplified and sequenced seven complete BKV genomes from the urine of Finnish RT patients (Table 5Down). These sequences (n=35) and the complete sequence of baboon polyomavirus SA-12 (a polyomavirus related closely to BKV; Cantalupo et al., 2005Down) were aligned, and the aligned sequences were used to construct an NJ phylogenetic tree. According to the resultant tree (Fig. 2Down), the BKV isolates analysed were divided into three major clusters, corresponding to subtypes I, III and IV, with high BPs (100 %) (no sequences belonging to subtype II were included in the analysis, as no subtype II isolates were available). Furthermore, subtype I was subdivided into three subclusters corresponding to Ib-1, Ib-2 and Ic, with high BPs (100 %) (as only a single isolate belonging to Ia was analysed, it remained unclear whether Ia also represents a distinct clade). Ic included only Japanese isolates, whilst Ib-2 included five Finnish, one Dutch and one American isolate. In addition, two Japanese subtype I isolates (TW-8 and RYU-2), outlying on the phylogenetic tree based on typing sequences (Fig. 1Up), fell into the Ic cluster. These findings support our hypothesis that there is geographical separation of European and Asian BKV strains.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. BKV isolates (n=35) whose complete DNA sequences were analysed (Fig. 2Up)

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. NJ phylogenetic tree relating 35 complete BKV DNA sequences. The phylogenetic tree was constructed from complete sequences, excluding regulatory sequences, by using the NJ method. The phylogenetic tree was visualized by using the NJplot program. The tree was rooted by using SA-12 (Cantalupo et al., 2005Down) as the outgroup. Subtypes and subtype I subgroups are indicated to the right of the tree. Symbols for sequences are shown in Table 4Up. Numbers at nodes indicate BPs (%) obtained from 1000 replicates.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Takasaka et al. (2004)Down found that most Japanese subtype I isolates of BKV that they examined were classified into subgroup Ic. To extend this observation, we analysed 287 bp typing sequences of BKV detected in the four patient populations by using two methods, a phylogenetic method and an SNP-based method. The patient populations had various clinical states and were from various ethnic backgrounds, and we therefore hoped that if any genomic variations of BKV were found among these patient populations, these variations could be ascribed to the difference in either clinical state or ethnic background. In fact, we detected two kinds of significant genomic variation of BKV among the patient populations analysed: subtype I versus subtype IV and subgroup Ib-2 versus subgroup Ic. Although it remained unclear whether the former is related to ethnic background or to clinical state, it was suggested that the latter is related to the ethnic background of the sample donors (see Results).

Ib-2 was detected at high rates in two representative European populations, Finnish and Irish/English, that are distantly related both geographically and linguistically (Ruhlen, 1987Down). Therefore, it is likely that Ib-2 is widespread among Europeans. In contrast, Ic was detected at a high rate in two patient populations of a single ethnic origin (i.e. Japanese). We recently investigated the distribution of BKV subtypes and subgroups in East Asia and found that, in eastern China, the incidence of Ic is higher than the other subtype I subgroups (Chen et al., 2006Down). Therefore, it appears that Ic is widespread among north-east Asians.

If Ib-2 and Ic are correlated to Europeans and East Asians, respectively, it is reasonable to assume that the other subtype I subgroups, Ia and Ib-1, are also linked to specific human populations. We speculate on their origins in the following paragraphs.

Only rare Ia isolates were detected in the Irish/English patients and none were detected in the Finnish and Japanese patients (Table 4Up). Three reference isolates (Gardner, DUN and MM) belonged to this subgroup (Table 2Up; Fig. 1Up). One of these (Gardner) was recovered from a Sudanese RT patient and the others were from patients in the USA, where people of various ethnic origins are admixed. Based on the available information, albeit greatly limited, we postulate tentatively that Ia originally occurred among Africans. As noted above, we detected Ia isolates in four patients in population B (the Irish/English population). We confirmed that these patients were all Irish. This may imply that Ia, originally transmitted from African immigrants, is now circulating among Irish people.

Ib-1 was detected at low rates in not only European, but also Japanese, patient populations (Table 4Up). Furthermore, several reference isolates (GS, Dik, WW and HI-u5) belonged to this subgroup (Table 2Up and Fig. 1Up). These isolates have been obtained in various countries, including England, the Netherlands, South Africa and the USA. Therefore, Ib-1 became widespread throughout the world, although it possibly originated in a human population that remains to be identified.

In summary, we present the first evidence that a correlation exists between two subtype I subgroups (Ib-2 and Ic) of BKV and human populations. If the distribution of subtype I subgroups in many human populations around the world can be obtained, it should elucidate an overall profile of the correlation between subtype I subgroups and human populations. In immunocompromised patients, BKV sometimes causes renal dysfunction, such as BKV-associated nephropathy (Moens & Rekvig, 2001Down). As subtype I is the major subtype of BKV in most human populations, the finding of a correlation between the subtype I subgroups of BKV and human populations should help further study on the relationship between the pathogenicity of BKV and human populations.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We are grateful to all of the urine donors. This study was supported in part by grants from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan.


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Agostini, H. T., Brubaker, G. R., Shao, J., Levin, A., Ryschkewitsch, C. F., Blattner, W. A. & Stoner, G. L. (1995). BK virus and a new type of JC virus excreted by HIV-1 positive patients in rural Tanzania. Arch Virol 140, 1919–1934.[CrossRef][Medline]

Agostini, H. T., Jobes, D. V. & Stoner, G. L. (2001). Molecular evolution and epidemiology of JC virus. In Human Polyomaviruses: Molecular and Clinical Perspectives, pp. 491–526. Edited by K. Khalili & G. L. Stoner. New York: Wiley.

Baksh, F. K., Finkelstein, S. D., Swalsky, P. A., Stoner, G. L., Ryschkewitsch, C. F. & Randhawa, P. (2001). Molecular genotyping of BK and JC viruses in human polyomavirus-associated interstitial nephritis after renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 38, 354–365.[Medline]

Cantalupo, P., Doering, A., Sullivan, C. S., Pal, A., Peden, K. W. C., Lewis, A. M. & Pipas, J. M. (2005). Complete nucleotide sequence of polyomavirus SA12. J Virol 79, 13094–13104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Carr, M. J., McCormack, G. P., Mutton, K. J. & Crowley, B. (2006). Unique BK virus non-coding control region (NCCR) variants in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with and without hemorrhagic cystitis. J Med Virol 78, 485–493.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chen, Y., Sharp, P. M., Fowkes, M., Kocher, O., Joseph, J. T. & Koralnik, I. J. (2004). Analysis of 15 novel full-length BK virus sequences from three individuals: evidence of a high intra-strain genetic diversity. J Gen Virol 85, 2651–2663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chen, Q., Zheng, H.-Y., Zhong, S. & 10 other authors (2006). Subtype IV of the BK polyomavirus is prevalent in East Asia. Arch Virol (in press). doi:10.1007/s00705-006-0814-z

Chesters, P. M., Heritage, J. & McCance, D. J. (1983). Persistence of DNA sequences of BK virus and JC virus in normal human tissues and in diseased tissues. J Infect Dis 147, 676–684.[Medline]

Di Taranto, C., Pietropaolo, V., Orsi, G. B., Jin, L., Sinibaldi, L. & Degener, A. M. (1997). Detection of BK polyomavirus genotypes in healthy and HIV-positive children. Eur J Epidemiol 13, 653–657.[CrossRef][Medline]

Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.[CrossRef]

Heritage, J., Chesters, P. M. & McCance, D. J. (1981). The persistence of papovavirus BK DNA sequences in normal human renal tissue. J Med Virol 8, 143–150.[Medline]

Hillis, D. M. & Bull, J. J. (1993). An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42, 182–192.[CrossRef]

Jeanmougin, F., Thompson, J. D., Gouy, M., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. (1998). Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends Biochem Sci 23, 403–405.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jin, L. (1993). Rapid genomic typing of BK virus directly from clinical specimens. Mol Cell Probes 7, 331–334.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jin, L., Gibson, P. E., Knowles, W. A. & Clewley, J. P. (1993a). BK virus antigenic variants: sequence analysis within the capsid VP1 epitope. J Med Virol 39, 50–56.[Medline]

Jin, L., Gibson, P. E., Booth, J. C. & Clewley, J. P. (1993b). Genomic typing of BK virus in clinical specimens by direct sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products. J Med Virol 41, 11–17.[Medline]

Jin, L., Pietropaolo, V., Booth, J. C., Ward, K. H. & Brown, D. W. (1995). Prevalence and distribution of BK virus subtypes in healthy people and immunocompromised patients detected by PCR-restriction enzyme analysis. Clin Diagn Virol 3, 285–295.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kimura, M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16, 111–120.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kitamura, T., Aso, Y., Kuniyoshi, N., Hara, K. & Yogo, Y. (1990). High incidence of urinary JC virus excretion in nonimmunosuppressed older patients. J Infect Dis 161, 1128–1133.[Medline]

Knowles, W. A. (2001). The epidemiology of BK virus and the occurrence of antigenic and genomic subtypes. In Human Polyomaviruses: Molecular and Clinical Perspectives, pp. 527–559. Edited by K. Khalili & G. L. Stoner. New York: Wiley.

Moens, U. & Rekvig, O. P. (2001). Molecular biology of BK virus and clinical and basic aspects of BK virus renal infection. In Human Polyomaviruses: Molecular and Clinical Perspectives, pp. 359–408. Edited by K. Khalili & G. L. Stoner. New York: Wiley.

Nishimoto, Y., Takasaka, T., Hasegawa, M., Zheng, H. Y., Qin, C., Sugimoto, C., Kitamura, T. & Yogo, Y. (2006). Evolution of BK virus based on complete genome data. J Mol Evol (in press). doi:10.1007/s00239-005-0092-5

Perrière, G. & Gouy, M. (1996). WWW-Query: an on-line retrieval system for biological sequence banks. Biochimie 78, 364–369.[Medline]

Ruhlen, M. (1987). A Guide to the World's Languages, vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Saitou, N. & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406–425.[Abstract]

Seif, I., Khoury, G. & Dhar, R. (1979). The genome of human papovavirus BKV. Cell 18, 963–977.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sugimoto, C., Hara, K., Taguchi, F. & Yogo, Y. (1990). Regulatory DNA sequence conserved in the course of BK virus evolution. J Mol Evol 31, 485–492.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sugimoto, C., Kitamura, T., Guo, J. & 16 other authors (1997). Typing of urinary JC virus DNA offers a novel means of tracing human migrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 9191–9196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takasaka, T., Goya, N., Tokumoto, T. & 14 other authors (2004). Subtypes of BK virus prevalent in Japan and variation in their transcriptional control region. J Gen Virol 85, 2821–2827.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tavis, J. E., Walker, D. L., Gardner, S. D. & Frisque, R. J. (1989). Nucleotide sequence of the human polyomavirus AS virus, an antigenic variant of BK virus. J Virol 63, 901–911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yang, R. C. & Wu, R. (1979). BK virus DNA: complete nucleotide sequence of a human tumor virus. Science 206, 456–462.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yogo, Y., Sugimoto, C., Zheng, H.-Y., Ikegaya, H., Takasaka, T. & Kitamura, T. (2004). JC virus genotyping offers a new paradigm in the study of human populations. Rev Med Virol 14, 179–191.[CrossRef][Medline]

Received 11 May 2006; accepted 27 July 2006.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
Y. Yogo, S. Zhong, Y. Xu, M. Zhu, Y. Chao, C. Sugimoto, H. Ikegaya, A. Shibuya, and T. Kitamura
Conserved archetypal configuration of the transcriptional control region during the course of BK polyomavirus evolution
J. Gen. Virol., August 1, 2008; 89(8): 1849 - 1856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
N. G. Hoffman, L. Cook, E. E. Atienza, A. P. Limaye, and K. R. Jerome
Marked Variability of BK Virus Load Measurement Using Quantitative Real-Time PCR among Commonly Used Assays
J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2008; 46(8): 2671 - 2680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
Y. Yogo, S. Zhong, M. Suzuki, A. Shibuya, and T. Kitamura
Occurrence of the European Subgroup of Subtype I BK Polyomavirus in Japanese-Americans Suggests Transmission outside the Family
J. Virol., December 1, 2007; 81(23): 13254 - 13258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ikegaya, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yogo, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ikegaya, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yogo, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ikegaya, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yogo, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS