J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 77 (1996), 1311-1321; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-77-6-1311
© 1996 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowings, P.
Right arrow Articles by Paton, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lowings, P.
Right arrow Articles by Paton, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lowings, P.
Right arrow Articles by Paton, D.

Classical swine fever virus diversity and evolution

Paul Lowings*, Georgina Ibata, Jennifer Needham and David Paton

Department of Virology, Central Veterinary Laboratory (Weybridge), Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK

By analysing the nucleotide sequence data generated from both the E2 (gp55) and the NS5B genes of classical swine fever virus (CSFV), in addition to previously published data from the 5'NCR, we were able to divide 115 CSFV isolates into two major groups, five subgroups and two disparate isolates. Further discrimination was possible by analysis of sequence data from the E2 region. The three sequencing based methods were compared to monoclonal antibody (MAb) typing and to limited restriction enzyme (RE) mapping. Although both MAb and RE methods confirmed the previous classification the resolution was inferior. We estimated an approximate evolution rate for CSFV from an analysis of the virus variation observed in a single geographical area over a 6 year period. Applying this proposed rate to each of our deduced CSFV subgroups enabled us to calculate the approximate dates of divergence for each subgroup.

* Author for correspondence. Fax +44 1932 357239. e-mail plowings.cvl.wood@gtnet.gov.uk

Received 6 October 1995; accepted 23 January 1996.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
jvdiHome page
C.-H. Pan, M.-H. Jong, Y.-L. Huang, T.-S. Huang, P.-H. Chao, and S.-S. Lai
Rapid detection and differentiation of wild-type and three attenuated lapinized vaccine strains of Classical swine fever virus by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
J Vet Diagn Invest, July 1, 2008; 20(4): 448 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
B. Kim, J-Y. Song, D-S. Tark, S-I. Lim, E-J. Choi, J. Kim, C-K. Park, B-Y. Lee, S-H. Wee, Y-C. Bae, et al.
Feed contaminated with classical swine fever vaccine virus (LOM strain) can induce antibodies to the virus in pigs
Vet Rec., January 5, 2008; 162(1): 12 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
G. Risatti, L. Holinka, Z. Lu, G. Kutish, J. D. Callahan, W. M. Nelson, E. Brea Tio, and M. V. Borca
Diagnostic Evaluation of a Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assay for Detection of Classical Swine Fever Virus
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2005; 43(1): 468 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
G. R. Risatti, J. D. Callahan, W. M. Nelson, and M. V. Borca
Rapid Detection of Classical Swine Fever Virus by a Portable Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assay
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2003; 41(1): 500 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1996 by the Society for General Microbiology.